I don't see how anyone can defend his play against Moneymaker. It was late in the tournament and he was one of the bigger stacks. There weren't enough chips in the pot for it to be worth the risk. Also, why choose to go up against Moneymaker, who also had a big stack and could cripple you if he called. I can understand this play against a short stack, but he had to know that if Moneymaker had any kind of pair he was 30% at best to win on the turn or river.