Being a pretty tight / aggressive player myself, I personally don't understand the philosophy of playing loose (those players are usually the most boisterous and the first to leave). Isn't the point of poker to make money? If you want to play loose and for fun, go to your local bar for one of those no buy-in fiascos they usually have. As for wanting to break a tight player, do you not find it aggravating to lose to them 70 - 80% of the time while paying them to aggravate you? I personally hate very loose players who "gamble". If you want to "gamble" play casino war or roulette or something where math, logic and probability have no affect on your play. Just my $.02