#61
|
|||
|
|||
Who was the player that beat Johnny out of the biggest pot before he won the WSOP 1988
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
All of you talking trash about Chan, he has triad mafia connections & they'll be looking at your IP address to come after you!
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
1985 $1,000 Limit Hold'em - $171,000
1987 $10,000 Championship Event - $625,000 1988 $10,000 Championship Event - $700,000 1994 $1,500 7-Card Stud - $135,600 1997 $5,000 Deuce to Seven Draw - $164,250 2000 $1,500 Pot Limit Omaha - $178,800 2002 $2,500 Heads Up Match Play 2003 $5,000 No Limit Hold'em - $224,400 2003 $5,000 Pot Limit Omaha - $158,100 Those are Chan's bracelets. "nothing since 1988" |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
hey those are all smaller events than the wsop and he keeps gettin kicked out early cuz he doesnt give a shiyat cuz hes flippin rich. he really has no respect for the game anymore yea he has 9 braclets but its been a while for him but hellmuth has 9 bracelets too and he's sure to get the tenth one first. oh and this is just my opinion BUT IM RIGHT
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Dutch Boyd will own Johnny Chan~
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Rounders is a tight movie? TIGHT? What moron calls a film tight. Win 2004 will he? Hmm. My money is on Raymer.
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
i'm on raymer
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Rounders is an amazing movie!!! Johnny chan is by far one of my favorite poker players...i just got into poker a bit ago and i would love to see Johnny Chan and Gus Hanson jam it together head to head.
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
yeah you can call a movie tight~! fer sure
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
helmuth is the best no limit hold 'em player alive
|
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Tourney of Champions saw Johnny outplay Hellmuth but lost on bad luck.
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
i think if you want to point out the real best of the best, chan is your man.
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
whoever is giving props to dutch boyd, can eat a dick. He is absolutely the biggest joke of them all. LMAO. Check out [url]www.thecrewisgay.com[/url]. None of those fools have shit on Chan.
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
He doesnt get kicked out because he sucks he gets kicked out because poeple know his style now. Just as Doyle Brunson lost early in he 2004 world series which he blamed on super system
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Chan's salad days are behind him unfortunately. He's a great guy and a solid player but it appears as if the game has passed him by. He has turned into an easy read. You get the impression that he just doesn't care anymore.
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
dutch boyd owning johnny chan?????are u high? boyd should be valeting chans car at the casino or running around picking oranges for johhny.. "so did you have it kid? i dont remember john"...funny stuff
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
People say that Chan's days are behind him, but keep in mind that in 1988 there was not nearly as many people playing in the WSOP main event. He's still a darn good pro!
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
I am not even gonna read any of this. I saw way too many people bashing Johnny Chan... Here is the thing, He is tied for 1st in bracelets, and hes 1st in over all winnings. enough said
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
chan is a good player. To be a good player you got to have patience and skills I got patience because i been in prison for 2years i been waiting for a long time skills i got too because im a good acter ande a good reader. But when im focus i feel like i could beat anybody it didnt matter if it was chan or juan or the other pros.
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
To be good be a good player you have to have more than have had two years prison under your belt.
|
#81
|
|||
|
|||
i think im cool with my cool "sammy the brick" name but in reality im making up for the fact that i suck at poker and like hurting defenceless animals
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Think of this Johnny Chan can regularly afford to play at the 1000/2000 and 2000/4000 tables at casinos. Bottom line is if you suck at poker... you would go bankrupt very quickly there. Chan is a master of his art.
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
"and johnny chan the master..."
|
#84
|
|||
|
|||
johnny chan is good but his ugly but deadly john juanda is good phil helmuth is the bad and johnny chan is the ugly the good and the bad and the ugly of poker
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
im the best player in the world can somebody let me borrow hundred thousand dollar so i could play with the high roller and i will prove that iam the best can i get a aman
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
chan is not only a great tourney player...he plays at the bellagio almost every day against the best in the world where you can loose a million dollars in a few hours...the guy is one of the best ever...and as far as borrowing a houndred thousand dollars to play agiant him bruce,,that might get you through a few rounds of the blinds against him...stick to nickel and dime games bruce ....
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
if you're the best, how come you're broke
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
johnny chan hasnt won anyhting since 88 but good thing is his still young he could still play for 40 more years. besides these guys they dont care about tournament they rather play 4000 to 8000 thats where the real money is at.
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
I think Chan's become to passive, as his play in the "superstar invational" might indicate. A touch of recklessness goes a long way.
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
i heard this guy owns a hooker house in vegas and there is high no limit games goin on in there
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|