|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is it less impressive when a satellite winner win a big tourney?
Is it less impressive when a satellite winner wins a bi8g tournament as opposed to someone who forks up the whole entry fee? Because they possibly may have less emotional pressure because they invested very little.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
no way
I would argue the opposite is true. I would say it is more impressive because it usually means that it was the only way they could afford the tournament and thus probably outside there normal quality of play and they had to win twice.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|