|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
i've seen this guy play on many occasions and he is a solid player...i've never wasted my time to post on this site but you dipshits out there that are criticizing him are just a bunch of wannabees that have no clue what talent is...i felt the need to share this with you (assuming you can read and didn't dictate your message to your mommy and have her type it in for you)...
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll win next years WSOP!!! I promise!!!!
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
one of the few players I would fear going heads up against. But if Ive got a brick in my pocket then I can take him out.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I love watching him win the 2002 WSOP main event. The way he does the thumbs up when he wins..... orgasmic.And his column in cardplayer magazine is riviting.Sammy the brick you can give me head anytime.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
What. A. DORK. Biggest nerd in poker. EVER.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
worst player to ever in big, worst person to ever play poker with, how can people put up with that guy?
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
With the possible exception of Hal Fowler in 1979 (when the field was much smaller), by far the worst player ever to win the WSOP Main Event. I honestly don't think that even $5-10 players in a typical ring game would have much to fear from this guy. His win in 2002 was perhaps the longest example of sustained ass-luck in the history of poker. He had won nothing before his WSOP win, and has won and will win nothing of major consequence since then. If it wasn't for the $2 million influx to his bankroll, he probably would not even be able to survive as a professional poker player fulltime (yes, I realize LOTS of people can't do that, but you would think a "World Champion" could - yet one more reason why the World Championship of Poker needs to be decided by something other than one no-limit hold 'em tournament).
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|